01 Corpus of Research & Doctrine

From Plato’s exile of the poets to Nietzsche’s beautiful lies, from Heidegger’s temples to Adorno’s negations, from Wilde’s paradoxes to Sontag’s erotics, art has always been placed on trial. Philosophers defended it or condemned it, but all assumed one premise: that art flirts with falsehood.

This essay establishes and distinguishes that filth in art is not an essence but an invention rather a curatorial and linguistic construct. The reality is misplacement: matter judged “filthy” only when displaced from its natural or meaningful context. Museums function as laundromats of perception.

Every critic carries a knife. Some sheath it in theory, others in flattery, but the blade is always there. Unsheathed the moment language touches the work.

Hauntmark Theory begins here, with the idea that language, once spoken over a work of art, doesn’t simply vanish. It lingers. It imprints. It echoes. What we say about a work may elevate it, distort it, or trap it in forms it never consented to wear.

Stillmark Theory reframes art as an encounter rather than an object. It’s a discipline of humility. A refusal to dominate or consume what was meant to be fleeting.