Museum of One public research index
An Independent Research Institute for Contemporary Aesthetics.
Public programme status reviewed: 2026-10-14

A discovery index of current public research programme records and their listed outputs, sources, and developments. Consult the linked programme pages for the current record. A programme’s stage and an output’s publication status are distinct.

Institutional identity
Museum of One: https://www.museumofone.art/
Identity: https://www.museumofone.art/#organization
About: https://www.museumofone.art/about/
Research contact: mailto:research@museumofone.art
Tarique is the founder; Dorian Vale is Tarique’s publishing name.
Author profile: https://www.museumofone.art/author/dorianvale/

Research and publication routes
programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
programmesMarkdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes.md
researchRecord2026: https://www.museumofone.art/research-record-2026/
earlyWritings: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/
journal: https://www.museumofone.art/the-journal-of-post-interpretive-criticism/
dialogues: https://www.museumofone.art/the-dialogues/
externalRecords: https://www.museumofone.art/external-records/
publisher: https://www.museumofone.art/publisher/
ethicalCharter: https://www.museumofone.art/ethical-charter/
archive: https://www.museumofone.art/digital-archive-library/
researchTools: https://www.museumofone.art/analytical-diagnostic-tools/
siteContentIndex: https://www.museumofone.art/llms.txt

1. Aesthetics, Experience, and Art-Historical Mediation
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/research-aesthetics-experience/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/research-aesthetics-experience/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-aesthetics-experience.md
Research topic: Aesthetics, experience, and restraint
Research question: The programme asks how a critic can remain accountable to an experience while recognising the historical and conceptual conditions that shape it. It attends to the relation between the work, the viewer, and the writing subject; to the use of names and categories; and to the limits of claims made on an artwork's behalf.
Research form: Co-authored book
Responsibility: Dong-Yeon Koh and Dorian Vale
Stage: In development
PIRR programme reference: moo-program-cea97d3424057b2f28700b16

Current work
Dong-Yeon Koh and Dorian Vale are co-authoring Between Image and Interpretation: On Restraint. The project examines interpretation, aesthetic experience, mediation, art history, and the developing implications of Post-Interpretive Criticism. It brings the philosophical question of restraint into contact with the ways art is encountered, situated, described, and understood.

The published conversation and the developing book are distinct records. This entry does not present the manuscript as a completed publication.

Outputs and developments
Title: The Conversation: Dong-Yeon Koh × Dorian Vale
Status: Published dialogue · Authorised archival record
Byline: Dong-Yeon Koh and Dorian Vale
The published conversation forms part of the continuing exchange informing the book programme. It is originally published and hosted by Koh. The public sequence currently extends through 04. The Interpreting Subject and Koh’s response. Latest published installments 04. The Interpreting Subject · Dorian Vale 04. The Interpreting Subject-In Response · Dong-Yeon Koh The originating conversation also includes the earlier exchanges on Post-Interpretive Criticism, anonymity, and the writing subject. These are published texts, not private correspondence.
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/dong-yeon-koh/

Title: Between Image and Interpretation: On Restraint
Status: Co-authored book in development
Byline: Dong-Yeon Koh and Dorian Vale
A developing manuscript, not a completed publication. No public manuscript download is provided here.
No public full-text download is listed.

Continuing developments
The published conversation and the developing book are distinct outputs of a continuing inquiry into aesthetic experience, historical mediation, and critical restraint. New public installments can be inspected on Koh’s originating conversation page. Public sources checked: 14 October 2026.

Public sources and related work
Read The Conversation: Dong-Yeon Koh × Dorian Vale: https://www.museumofone.art/dong-yeon-koh/
Visit the original conversation: https://www.dongyeonkoh.com/conversation
04. The Interpreting Subject: https://www.dongyeonkoh.com/the-interpreting-subject
04. The Interpreting Subject-In Response: https://www.dongyeonkoh.com/the-interpreting-subject-response
Koh's scholarly profile and publications: https://www.dongyeonkoh.com/about
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/research-aesthetics-experience/#programme-outputs
Publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/

2. Alexander Viktorovich Markov: Critical Language and Lasting Correction
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/research-critical-language/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/research-critical-language/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-critical-language.md
Research topic: Critical language and lasting correction
Research question: What makes a correction to an interpretation remain effective over time?
Research form: Theoretical dialogue
Responsibility: Alexander Viktorovich Markov and Dorian Vale
Stage: In development
PIRR programme reference: moo-program-2b3ad664cbd92f69b862db8c

Current work
A developing theoretical dialogue with philosopher and literary theorist Alexander Viktorovich Markov concerns the authority of critical language and the endurance of correction. The programme asks how an interpretation comes to guide subsequent decisions, and what allows a justified correction to remain available and effective when that interpretation is encountered again.

This direction extends Museum of One's concern with the afterlife of criticism: how language continues to shape an encounter after its immediate occasion, and how responsibility for that language can remain answerable over time. Possible shared writing remains developing; no agreed writing form or venue is announced here.

Outputs and developments
Title: Critical language and lasting correction
Status: Dialogue in development
Byline: Alexander Viktorovich Markov and Dorian Vale
The theoretical dialogue investigates how a justified correction remains available and effective over time. Possible shared writing remains developing; the public record announces neither an agreed writing format nor a venue. No completed joint publication is listed in this programme’s public record.
No public full-text download is listed.

Title: Successive museum titles and the circulation of corrections
Status: Independent documentary working study · Not published
Byline: Dorian Vale · Descriptive record of a working study
A documentary working study by Dorian Vale examines successive museum titles and their circulation across collection and derivative records. It has been shared for critical discussion. This is not a published paper or a completed joint publication. No draft download is provided.
No public full-text download is listed.

Continuing developments
Continuing research distinguishes correction, later naming completion, transmission and maintenance. These questions remain under investigation; the working study is not presented as validation of the framework or as an agreed joint publication.

Public sources and related work
Read Hauntmark Theory: The Lingering Weight of Words: https://www.museumofone.art/hauntmark-theory-the-lingering-weight-of-words/
Read The Afterlife of the Work: Viewer as Evidence in Post-Interpretive Criticism: https://www.museumofone.art/the-afterlife-of-the-work-viewer-as-evidence-in-post-interpretive-criticism/
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/research-critical-language/#programme-outputs
Publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/

3. Intellectual History and Conceptual Development
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/research-intellectual-history/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/research-intellectual-history/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-intellectual-history.md
Research topic: Intellectual history and conceptual development
Research question: This programme follows the development of Post-Interpretive Criticism's vocabulary, distinctions, and qualifications across the published work. It examines how a concept is introduced, how its use changes, and how later arguments qualify earlier formulations.
Research form: Source-based research
Responsibility: Museum of One
Stage: Continuing research
PIRR project ID: pir-prj-xgd6wb9d

Current work
The Living Lexicon records concepts within an evolving research context. A definition does not establish universal adoption or independent validation. Source-based research keeps a term attached to the work in which it is proposed and the argument through which its use is defended.

Outputs and developments
Title: The Living Lexicon: Post-Interpretive Criticism – First Edition
Status: Public reference resource
Byline: Dorian Vale
An existing lexicon used to trace the vocabulary and formulations of Post-Interpretive Criticism. Its availability is a public reference point, not evidence that its definitions are settled or independently validated.
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/the-living-lexicon/

Continuing developments
Source-based research follows how terms are introduced, changed, defended, and qualified across the published work. The historical formulations remain attached to their sources rather than being silently replaced by later definitions.
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine ↗
Historical source collection, not a new programme-specific publication.
Publication register ↗
Published texts and edition records.

Public sources and related work
Read the Living Lexicon: https://www.museumofone.art/the-living-lexicon/
Browse Early Writings: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
View the publication register: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/research-intellectual-history/#programme-outputs

4. Paul Gladston: Witnessing, Chinese Aesthetics, and Curatorial Afterlives
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/paul-gladston/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/paul-gladston/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/paul-gladston.md
Research topic: Witnessing and curatorial afterlives
Research question: How do witnessing, Chinese aesthetics, and plural critical perspectives shape a curatorial encounter, and what happens to a framework after it enters circulation?
Research form: Written dialogue in development
Responsibility: Paul Gladston and Dorian Vale
Stage: In development

Current work
The conversation developed from reciprocal correspondence and an agreed exchange of questions, responses, and follow-up responses. Its aim is to let each contribution alter the next stage rather than fix the encounter in advance as a completed interview.

Gladston’s scholarship supplies distinct perspectives on contemporary Chinese art, cultural translation, deconstruction, and polylogue. Vale brings questions developed through Post-Interpretive Criticism about witnessing, mediation, and how provisional accounts can shape later encounters. These contributions remain attributable to their respective authors; a shared conversation does not imply complete theoretical agreement.

Outputs and developments
Title: Post-Interpretive Criticism, Chinese Aesthetics, and the Curatorial Encounter
Status: Working conversation manuscript · Not yet published
Byline: Paul Gladston and Dorian Vale
Vale prepared and shared the initial framing and questions on 31 August 2026, followed by a Word working document on 1 September. Gladston has returned a first pass of his responses. The next stage is Vale’s follow-up responses and further clarification and expansion of the conversation. The intended publication is a developing conversation for The Journal of Post-Interpretive Criticism. A working manuscript and returned responses are research outputs, but they do not establish a finished or published text. The private draft and correspondence are not reproduced here.
No public full-text download is listed.

Continuing developments
The dialogue examines witnessing, the relation between Chinese aesthetics and deconstruction, critical polylogue, and the later effects of curatorial frameworks. A possible subsequent case-led inquiry concerns whether public objections can contribute to a work’s critical effects while leaving concerns that still require an answer. This remains a proposed continuation, not a completed study or a separately agreed publication.

No completed programme dialogue is linked as published work. Public curatorial sources informing the discussion are listed in Research context; they are not outputs of this exchange.

Public sources and related work
The Journal of Post-Interpretive Criticism: https://www.museumofone.art/the-journal-of-post-interpretive-criticism/
Paul Gladston: https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/paul-gladston
In-/Visible Spectrums: https://www.unsw.edu.au/arts-design-architecture/jncca/news-and-events/events/in-visible-spectrums
Yique’s Way — Mutuality in Extremes: https://www.unsw.edu.au/arts-design-architecture/jncca/news-and-events/events/yiques-way
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/paul-gladston/#programme-outputs
Publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/
Find output records within other programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/#programme-outputs

5. Phenomenological Methods and Diagnostic Reading
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods.md
Research topic: Phenomenological methods
Research question: This programme examines whether the conduct of critical writing can be described with sufficient precision to support comparison, disagreement, and revision. It connects phenomenological aesthetics with practical questions about what a text observes, what it infers, how forcefully it interprets, and what evidence supports its claims.
Research form: Research and experimental methods
Responsibility: Museum of One
Stage: Continuing research
PIRR project ID: pir-prj-pyp5yx3w

Current work
Measuring Proximity, From Husserl's Mathematics to Dufrenne's Aesthetics, and Quantifying Critical Posture develop the published methodological sequence. Diagnostics Without Possession provides an operational reference for coding and inter-rater reliability work. Associated reading tools let readers inspect proposed distinctions and explore their application to critical language.

Outputs and developments
Title: Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism (Post-Hermeneutic Phenomenology) v.2
Status: Published methodological essay
Byline: Dorian Vale · Site publication date: 9 January 2026
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/measuring-proximity-a-post-interpretive-diagnostic-experiment-in-art-criticism-post-hermeneutic-phenomenology/

Title: From Husserl’s Mathematics to Dufrenne’s Aesthetics: Toward a Formalization of Phenomenological Aesthetics v.2
Status: Published methodological essay
Byline: Dorian Vale · Site publication date: 10 January 2026
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/from-husserls-mathematics-to-dufrennes-aesthetics-toward-a-formalization-of-phenomenological-aesthetics/

Title: Quantifying Critical Posture: A Diagnostic Analysis of Art Writing, 1980–2025 (v.2)
Status: Published diagnostic study
Byline: Dorian Vale · Site publication date: 5 February 2026
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/quantifying-critical-posture-a-diagnostic-analysis-of-art-writing-1980-2025-formalizing-post-hermeneutic-phenomenology/

Title: Diagnostics Without Possession: An Operational Manual for Post-Interpretive Criticism (Operational reference for inter-rater reliability)
Status: Published operational manual
Byline: Dorian Vale · Site publication date: 9 May 2026
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/diagnostics-without-possession-an-operational-manual-for-post-interpretive-criticism-operational-reference-for-inter-rater-reliability/

Continuing developments
Coding, inter-rater reliability work, and comparative reading require examination of the assumptions, exclusions, and limits of the proposed methods. The research and diagnostic tools provide associated resources for inspecting those proposals.

Dates above are the site’s publication dates, not claims about when a later version was released. Version labels follow the linked records.

Preparatory curatorial micro-study
Status: Preparatory research; no completed findings or published output
A small comparative study is being scoped around a curatorial framing decision. Preparatory work concerns alternative texts, documentation, and comparative reading. This is preparatory research, not completed findings or a published output. No case or participant activity is announced here. Public attribution will be added only after it is agreed.

Related development in Witness, Material Presence, and Cultural Memory ↗
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods/#preparatory-curatorial-study

Public sources and related work
Read Diagnostics Without Possession: https://www.museumofone.art/diagnostics-without-possession-an-operational-manual-for-post-interpretive-criticism-operational-reference-for-inter-rater-reliability/
Explore research and diagnostic tools: https://www.museumofone.art/analytical-diagnostic-tools/
Read the source and scale notes: https://www.museumofone.art/measuring-proximity-a-post-interpretive-diagnostic-experiment-in-art-criticism-post-hermeneutic-phenomenology/
Read the published essay: https://www.museumofone.art/from-husserls-mathematics-to-dufrennes-aesthetics-toward-a-formalization-of-phenomenological-aesthetics/
Read the published study: https://www.museumofone.art/quantifying-critical-posture-a-diagnostic-analysis-of-art-writing-1980-2025-formalizing-post-hermeneutic-phenomenology/
Related development in Witness, Material Presence, and Cultural Memory: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory/#preparatory-curatorial-study
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods/#programme-outputs
Publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/
Browse the phenomenology collection: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/04-phenomenology/

6. Reiko Tomii: Operation and Historical Answerability
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/reiko-tomii/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/reiko-tomii/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/reiko-tomii.md
Research topic: Operation and historical answerability
Research question: How can evidence of artistic labour, organization, and access change an art-historical account, rather than remain background to it?
Research form: Independent inquiry following discussion with Reiko Tomii
Responsibility: Dorian Vale
Stage: In development
PIRR programme reference: moo-program-fc96d462c463652ce260cd27

Current work
Following discussion with Reiko Tomii and engagement with her published research, Dorian Vale is developing an independent inquiry into operation, documentation, and historical answerability. It asks how evidence of artistic labour, organization, and access can change an art-historical account, rather than remain background to it.

Tomii's distinction between expression and operation provides a point of contact. Vale's further question concerns what an account must do when operational evidence places pressure on an established interpretation: what must be revised, which claims remain supportable, and how the grounds of a correction can remain available to later readers.

Tomii's conceptual contribution and historical work are attributed to her. The further argument and proposed research direction belong to Vale. This entry does not imply her coauthorship, endorsement, participation in every part of the inquiry, or an agreed joint publication.

The discussion and the independent working study are distinct from a published dialogue. Private meeting records and correspondence are not reproduced here.

Outputs and developments
Title: Answerability: Exhibition, Documentation, and Historical Evidence in Postwar Japanese Art
Status: Independent working paper · 9 October 2026
Byline: Dorian Vale · Museum of One
This is an independent working paper by Vale, not a coauthored publication with Tomii or a claim of her endorsement. The title and working-paper status are recorded here; the draft is not publicly downloadable.
No public full-text download is listed.

Continuing developments
The programme continues to investigate how evidence of artistic labour, organization, and access can change an art-historical account. The essay is an output of the inquiry; it does not close the programme.

Public sources and related work
Read Tomii's Thinking Operationally: https://doi.org/10.37050/wpc-co-01%5F05
Read Hauntmark Theory: The Lingering Weight of Words: https://www.museumofone.art/hauntmark-theory-the-lingering-weight-of-words/
Read The Afterlife of the Work: https://www.museumofone.art/the-afterlife-of-the-work-viewer-as-evidence-in-post-interpretive-criticism/
Tomii's book and scholarly profile at MIT Press: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262535311/radicalism-in-the-wilderness/
Explore Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/reiko-tomii/#programme-outputs
Publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/

7. Threads of Sand: Arabic Translation
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/arabic-translation-threads-of-sand/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/arabic-translation-threads-of-sand/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/arabic-translation-threads-of-sand.md
Research topic: Threads of Sand in Arabic
Research question: How can a critical study of Sudanese art address war, displacement and cultural memory through the ethics of witnessing?
Research form: Arabic translation
Responsibility: Osman Omran, translator; Dorian Vale, author
Stage: In development
PIRR programme reference: moo-program-ccb726880981ccbeb400023c

Current work
Threads of Sand is being translated into Arabic by Osman Omran, a Sudanese graphic and book designer and freelance translator based in Muscat, Oman.

Omran proposed the translation for Sudanese readers and a wider Arabic-language readership. Dorian Vale authorized the work on 21 August 2026 and accepted the proposed translator's preface. Omran subsequently reported that the translation was progressing.

The work extends the book's access across languages while retaining the distinction between the author's argument and the translator's contribution. Translation, design, and an eventual edition are related activities, but progress in one does not establish that the others are complete.

The Arabic translation is authorized and in progress. No completed Arabic edition, delivery date, or publishing agreement is announced here.

Outputs and developments
Title: Arabic translation of Threads of Sand, Scar & Scripture
Status: Arabic translation in progress
Byline: Osman Omran, translator · Dorian Vale, author
Translation was authorized on 21 August 2026, with the proposed translator’s preface accepted. The programme records subsequent reported progress, not a completed Arabic edition. No delivery date or publishing agreement is announced in the current public record.
No public full-text download is listed.

Title: Threads of Sand, Scar & Scripture
Status: Published English-language source edition
Byline: Dorian Vale · Sudanese Art & the Ethics of Witness
The existing English-language study is the source for the translation. Its publication does not establish that the Arabic edition is complete.
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-threads-of-sand/

Continuing developments
The work extends access across languages while preserving the distinction between the author’s argument and the translator’s contribution. Translation, design, and an eventual edition are related activities; progress in one does not establish completion of the others.

Public sources and related work
Find the existing English-language publication in the publication register: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/
Publication and repository record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-threads-of-sand/
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/arabic-translation-threads-of-sand/#programme-outputs
Explore related witness studies: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/canon-of-witnesses/
Read related art criticism and field essays: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/art-criticism-reflective-field-essays/

8. Witness, Material Presence, and Cultural Memory
Programme identity: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory/#programme
Public page: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory/
Markdown: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory.md
Research topic: Witness, material presence, and memory
Research question: Applied criticism tests the responsibilities described in the philosophical work against particular artworks, spaces, materials, and histories. This programme attends to absence, grief, displacement, material fatigue, and the persistence of a work's consequences without allowing a subject's seriousness to stand in for close attention.
Research form: Field essays and studies
Responsibility: Museum of One
Stage: Continuing research
PIRR project ID: pir-prj-dd7kt5rw

Current work
The Canon of Witnesses and the field essays preserve encounters with named works and artists. Long-form publications extend this inquiry to Sudanese art and the ethics of witnessing, and to architecture, power, and the moral evidence of space.

Outputs and developments
Title: Art That Falls Apart: Material Fatigue as Moral Statement
Status: Published field essay
Byline: Dorian Vale · Site publication date: 29 July 2026
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/art-that-falls-apart-material-fatigue-as-moral-statement/

Title: Canon of Witnesses
Status: Published essay collection · Volume III
Byline: Dorian Vale
Collected encounters with artists, absence, repetition, ritual, and residue.
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-canon-of-witnesses/

Title: Essays from the Field
Status: Published essay collection · Volume II
Byline: Dorian Vale · First edition, 2025
Field and educational essays on witnessing, restraint, and moral proximity.
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-essays-from-field/

Title: Threads of Sand, Scar & Scripture
Status: Published study
Byline: Dorian Vale · Sudanese Art & the Ethics of Witness
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-threads-of-sand/

Title: The Moral Evidence of Space
Status: Published study
Byline: Dorian Vale · Architecture, Power, and the Ethics of Witnessing
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-moral-evidence-of-space/

Continuing developments
The programme continues to test critical responsibility against named works, spaces, materials, and histories. Published studies make its descriptions and judgments inspectable; they do not close the inquiry.

Preparatory curatorial micro-study
Status: Preparatory research; no completed findings or published output
A small comparative study is being scoped around a curatorial framing decision. Preparatory work concerns alternative texts, documentation, and comparative reading. This is preparatory research, not completed findings or a published output. No case or participant activity is announced here. Public attribution will be added only after it is agreed.

Related development in Phenomenological Methods and Diagnostic Reading ↗
Public record: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory/#preparatory-curatorial-study

Public sources and related work
Read the published essay: https://www.museumofone.art/art-that-falls-apart-material-fatigue-as-moral-statement/
Browse the Canon of Witnesses: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/canon-of-witnesses/
Browse critical writing and field essays: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/art-criticism-reflective-field-essays/
Publication and repository record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-canon-of-witnesses/
Publication and original volume record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-essays-from-field/
Publication and repository record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-threads-of-sand/
Publication and repository record: https://www.museumofone.art/publication-moral-evidence-of-space/
Related development in Phenomenological Methods and Diagnostic Reading: https://www.museumofone.art/research-methods/#preparatory-curatorial-study
Early Writings: Foundations and Doctrine: https://www.museumofone.art/tag/early-writings/
Research Programmes: https://www.museumofone.art/research-programmes/
Outputs and developments: https://www.museumofone.art/research-witness-material-memory/#programme-outputs
View long-form publications: https://www.museumofone.art/publications/